<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Hakeem Jeffries</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26180/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Term-Limits Hearings: Thompson Thunders, Velazquez Jokes</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/term-limits-hearings-thompson-thunders-velazquez-jokes</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>More from intern Glenna Goldis at the Council term-limits hearings:</p>
<blockquote><p>The second set of testimony on term limits today included Comptroller Bill Thompson, who yesterday <a href="http://www2.observer.com/2008/politics/thompson-running-against-bloomberg-yes">said</a> he would run for mayor even if it meant challenging Bloomberg. Several times, the audience began to clap but then stifled itself to avoid censure from the chair.</p>
<p>But there were other testifying officials who received more attention from the Council.</p>
<p>Representative Nydia Velazquez, who testified first, said that times of crisis were exactly when the electoral process needed to be respected. She said that the proposed legislation to allow term-limited incumbents to run for an extra term would hurt minority opportunities for office, which could in turn draw a veto from the federal justice department.</p>
 <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/term-limits-hearings-thompson-thunders-velazquez-jokes">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/term-limits-hearings-thompson-thunders-velazquez-jokes#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24736">Bill Thompson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24244">Charles Barron</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26180">Hakeem Jeffries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24465">Lew Fidler</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24837">New York City Council</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25053">Nydia Velazquez</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25058">Simcha Felder</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:59:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Josh Benson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">77144 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jeffries on Bloomberg&#039;s &#039;Development Gone Wild&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/jeffries-bloomberg-development</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>I just came across this video of Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries speaking at a forum in Brooklyn recently (according to the YouTube user, it was on May 31). </p>
<p>Jeffries slams the mayor for promoting so much development in the city, and jokes that there should be a movie called “Development Gone Wild,&quot; which Jeffries says would be &quot;starring Mayor Bloomberg and co-starring Dan Doctoroff.”</p>
<p>(It’s not my favorite visual, either.) </p>
<p>Jeffries says his issue is less with safety than with the problems associated with gentrification.  </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/jeffries-bloomberg-development#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/dan-doctoroff">Dan Doctoroff</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26180">Hakeem Jeffries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/michael-bloomberg">Michael Bloomberg</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:34:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Azi Paybarah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70432 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hakeem Jeffries: &#039;Yes We Can&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/hakeem-jeffries-and-obamas-favorite-slogan</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><object width="400" height="334"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2W4Jk2DLlkg&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2W4Jk2DLlkg&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="400" height="334"></embed></object><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Here's Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries of Brooklyn inadvertently igniting a &quot;Yes we can&quot; chant during a rally for Barack Obama on the steps of City Hall yesterday.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/hakeem-jeffries-and-obamas-favorite-slogan#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26180">Hakeem Jeffries</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:32:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Azi Paybarah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">64159 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Brooklyn Electeds Flock to Obama Rally at City Hall</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/obamas-brooklyn-dominated-rally-city-hall</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>How many black elected officials from Brooklyn were at the rally for Barack Obama on the City Hall steps this afternoon?</p>
<p>Enough that State Senator Bill Perkins of Harlem muttered to himself at the podium, “Oh man, we’re going to have to mix this up a bit.” He then introduced state Senator Eric Adams--who's from Brooklyn. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/obamas-brooklyn-dominated-rally-city-hall">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/obamas-brooklyn-dominated-rally-city-hall#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24888">Bill Perkins</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50278">Haile Rivera</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26180">Hakeem Jeffries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24904">John Sampson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52976">Karim Camara</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24916">Major Owens</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52975">Norman Seabrook</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52977">Ronnie Eldridge</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:46:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Azi Paybarah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">64119 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Spitz in the Soup</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/spitz-soup</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Football at presidential debate, shunned by Democrats, Governor Spitzer has become political pariah of party; Roger Stone gleeful, Anthony Weiner stressed out. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/spitz-soup">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/spitz-soup#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">O2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24243">Anthony Weiner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51551">Driver&amp;#039;s Licenses</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/eliot-spitzer">Eliot Spitzer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26180">Hakeem Jeffries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50130">Immigration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24980">Jose Peralta</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51552">Richard Schaffer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25736">Roger Stone</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:11:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Azi Paybarah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">59985 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Roger Stone: Dems Knew About Harmonie Membership</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/roger-stone-dems-knew-about-harmonie-membership</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Roger Stone doesn’t think much of the <a href="/2007/roger-stone-and-harmonie" target="_blank">suggestion (based on my reading of a Weekly Standard story) that he had any role in drumming up</a> a controversy over the fact that Eliot Spitzer’s father and MTA nominee Dale Hemmerdinger were members of the racially un-diverse Harmonie Club. Hemmerdinger's membership became a contentious political issue after an angry letter from Democratic Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries.</p>
<p>  Stone emails:</p>
<blockquote><p> Azi<br />  Just for the record, I never spoke to Hakim Jeffries, never spoke to  his people and never asked anyone to speak to him. In fact, until I read the story I never heard of him.</p></blockquote>
<p>  He also said, “I admire what Jeffries did.” </p></blockquote>
<p>  In another email, Stone wrote: <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/roger-stone-dems-knew-about-harmonie-membership">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/roger-stone-dems-knew-about-harmonie-membership#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/34247">Bernard Spitzer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/44378">Dale Hemmerdinger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/eliot-spitzer">Eliot Spitzer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26180">Hakeem Jeffries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51061">Mort Zuckerman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25736">Roger Stone</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:28:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Azi Paybarah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">59528 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Roger Stone and a Spitzer Controversy [updated]</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/roger-stone-and-harmonie</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>A new <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=14278&amp;R=1157427EDC" target="_blank">Weekly Standard profile of Roger Stone</a> has a suggestive nugget implying that he is still playing a quietly active role in a broad-based anti-Spitzer coalition.   </p>
<p>From the story:   <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/roger-stone-and-harmonie">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/roger-stone-and-harmonie#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/34247">Bernard Spitzer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/44378">Dale Hemmerdinger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26180">Hakeem Jeffries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25736">Roger Stone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/36220">The Weekly Standard Magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:12:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Azi Paybarah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">59504 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jeffries Turns on Atlantic Yards</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/hakeem-turns-atlantic-yards</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Hakeem Jeffries, the freshman Assembly Member, was once accused of <a href="http://dailygotham.com/blog/mole333/hakeem_jefferies_flip_flop_flips_on_atlantic_yards">being a toady for the developer of Atlantic Yards</a>, Forest City Ratner. But he had gradually become <a href="/node/35405">more critical</a>, and <a href="/2007/421a-bill-gives-special-treatment-atlantic-yards">the last minute carve-out in the 421a housing incentive bill that <em>The Observer</em> reported on Wednesday</a> made him fairly seethe at the project&#39;s cost to taxpayers.<br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>“The Atlantic Yards project has feasted on government funds for far too long,” he said in a statement this afternoon. “Enough is enough.<span> </span>There is absolutely no justification for treating Atlantic Yards better than any other development project in New York, when Forest City Ratner has already received $300 million in government subsidies.”</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mr. Jeffries, along with five other Assembly members, voted against a technical amendment to the 421a reform as a protest. He missed a vote yesterday morning for the main 421a reform bill, which greatly expanded the number of neighborhoods in which developers will have to include low-income housing in new apartment buildings in order to qualify for tax abatements.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/hakeem-turns-atlantic-yards">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/hakeem-turns-atlantic-yards#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24996">Atlantic Yards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26180">Hakeem Jeffries</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 18:41:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matthew Schuerman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">55428 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Important Endorsements of Wright and Jeffries</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/importance-unimportant</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>I&#39;m up in Albany for the New York State Democratic Committee Spring Business Meeting at the Desmond Hotel, a few miles away from the capitol.</p>
<p>Since the first meeting I was hoping to attend--the Council of Black Elected Democrats-- is closed to the press, I figured I&#39;d post notes from chat with two  Assembly members I spoke with yesterday. </p>
<p>The two officials, Assemblyman Keith Wright of Harlem and Hakeem Jeffries of Brooklyn, have something in common. Unlike some Democrats -- Eliot Spitzer, Sheldon Silver, Andrew Cuomo, David Paterson and Malcolm Smith, among others -- they won&#39;t be <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2007/05/new_york_electeds_for_hillary.html" target="_blank">endorsing</a> Hillary Clinton on Monday.</p>
<p>Jeffries said he would probably make his decision sometime in June, along with Brooklyn lawmakers Rep. Yvette Clarke, State Senator Eric Adams and Assemblyman Karim Camara.</p>
<p>Wright, by contrast, doesn&#39;t seem to be on any timetable at all. </p>
<p>“So far, I don’t have any plans,” Wright told me. “I haven’t had my chat with Hillary. I know she’s busy. And lord knows I haven’t had any talks with Barack.” </p>
<p>I asked Wright if he was more disappointed in not getting a call from Clinton or from Obama.</p>
<p> “I’m not disappointed in either,” he said, laughing.</p>
<p> “I remember in ‘92, Clinton was calling people left and right. I just haven’t heard from any of them, if you will,” he said, referring to the 2008 candidates. “I’m not making anything of it.”</p>
<p>And, based on the line of questioning about black officials in New York still holding out on their endorsements, he also offered me the following: </p>
<p>&quot;It sounds like you’re going to write a story. I love it. I love it. Make us important with our unimportance.”</p>
<p>Yes, sir! </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/importance-unimportant#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26180">Hakeem Jeffries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25064">Keith Wright</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 16:32:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Azi Paybarah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">53931 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jeffries To Silver: Atlantic Yards&#039; Density Worries Me</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/35405</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Hakeem Jeffries, the state Assembly member-elect for the 57th district, which is ground zero for Atlantic Yards, did not sign on to <a href="http://thepoliticker.observer.com/2006/11/opposed-gently.html ">his future colleagues' demands to scale down the Forest City Ratner project</a>, but he is speaking to Assembly Speaker Shelly Silver about it. 

<p>Jeffries told The Real Estate on Tuesday that he had a conversation about a week to 10 days ago to express many of the same concerns as Assembly members Jim Brennan, Joan Millman and Annette Robinson did. In the order Jeffries mentioned them, his concerns are: building more affordable housing early on as part of the project, the lack of transparency regarding the project's financing, the lack of public involvement, and, upon prompting, its density. Jeffries said that he would speak with Silver again soon.</p>

Jeffries is known to be hard to read (some would say <a href="http://atlanticyardsvote.blogspot.com/2006/09/daily-news-endorses-hakeems-support-of.html ">slippery</a>) on Atlantic Yards, and he refused to compare his position with that of Brennan's camp. 

<p>"I have always felt that eminent domain is one of government's most exceptional powers. I don't believe that a private developer should be able to use it to build a basketball arena." But he also said that the courts should be allowed to decide the issue.</p>

That, of course, is axiomatic: you don't need a first-term assemblyman saying that one should obey a court order. He clarified: "If they decide it is constitutional, then we have to find out other ways to make it tenable to the community."

<p>Jeffries, like his colleagues, does favor slowing the approval process down, starting with the Empire State Development Corporation. "I'm not particularly clear they have done <a href="http://therealestate.observer.com/2006/11/atlantic-yards-approval-could-be-delayed-by-impact-statement.html">all they were supposed to do</a> to make sure they included all the public comments."</p>

-<em> Matthew Schuerman</em>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/35405#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24996">Atlantic Yards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26180">Hakeem Jeffries</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27182">Jim Brennan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24651">Shelly Silver</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:55:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35405 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
