<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Manhattan</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24265/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Condo Sales, That Great Manhattan Barometer, Plunge From &#039;07</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/prices-sales-down-manhattan-condos-0</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><em>This is the first in a three-part series today covering the Manhattan housing market since autumn 2007. </em>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Manhattan condo sales dropped 22.6 percent annually in the third quarter of 2008, according to a new report from appraisal firm Miller Samuel and brokerage giant Prudential Douglas Elliman. At the same time, the 12 months from September 2007 to now, the median sales price, the average sales price and the average sales price per square foot for a Manhattan condo increased.</p>
<p>With lower downpayments and no co-op board process, condos are the gateway buy for many New York homeowners; and therefore a solid barometer of where the borough's housing market has been and where it may be going in tougher economic times.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/prices-sales-down-manhattan-condos-0">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/prices-sales-down-manhattan-condos-0#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50069">Condos</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50017">Housing market</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24265">Manhattan</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:35:15 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Oliver Haydock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76369 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Queens Tops in Summer Foreclosures; Manhattan Notches 35</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/outer-boroughs-blow</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>There were 665 new foreclosures in Queens during the third quarter of 2008, according to PropertyShark's new report (<a href="http://www.propertyshark.com/mason/components/blogcenter/pdf_report.mas?id=28">PDF here</a>), which accounted for half of the new foreclosure auctions in New York City and helped push New York’s quarterly foreclosures to a two-year high of 1,118.
<p>In general, first-time foreclosures were higher in the outer boroughs and relatively non-existent in Manhattan, where there were only 35 in the three months ending Sept. 30. Staten Island had the second-highest number, with 174, followed by Brooklyn (165) and the Bronx (79).  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/outer-boroughs-blow">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/outer-boroughs-blow#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51018">foreclosures</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24265">Manhattan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55166">propertyshark</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49998">Queens</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:16:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Oliver Haydock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76314 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sunrise, Sunset</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/sunrise-sunset</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>&quot;Change is part of nature's progression. As much as we all romanticize about how it was back then in NYC, we cannot be complacent and let it roll over us. I do miss the gritty NYC but how does one adapt to a changed city when one is emotionally attached to it's past. Like a relationsship, it evolves and thus so do we. Bring it on. The cultural, avante garde and the the hip will always have a spot here. It will be different but NYC can not exist without it. Stick to your guns people, accept the change, but adapt to it. Dont change because of it.&quot; [<a href="/2008/real-estate/incredibly-shrinking-native-manhattanite-manhattan#comments">&quot;The Incredibly Shrinking Native Manhattanite in Manhattan&quot;</a>] </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/sunrise-sunset#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24265">Manhattan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57099">manhattanites</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:03:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Acitelli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74941 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Incredibly Shrinking Native Manhattanite in Manhattan</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/incredibly-shrinking-native-manhattanite-manhattan</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>"We are a very happy and yet jaded people," said Zoe Schneider, 36, the creator of Zoe Lou Designs, a line of New York-themed kid's clothes.</p>
<p>Ms. Schneider was standing at the dimly lit entrance of Dusk Lounge bar on West 24th Street last Tuesday evening. Inside was September's gathering of <a href="http://www.nycmagicgarden.com/">The Magic Garden</a>, a regular congregation of people raised in the five boroughs.</p>
<p>Ms. Schneider is the club's founder.</p>
<p>"We used to play 'where's the native' at Luna Lounge," she said, talking about how she arrived at the idea for the club. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/incredibly-shrinking-native-manhattanite-manhattan">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/incredibly-shrinking-native-manhattanite-manhattan#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24352">Brooklyn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24265">Manhattan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57099">manhattanites</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:05:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Em Whitney</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74854 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Brooklyn vs. Manhattan: A Handy Price Guide</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/brooklyn-vs-manhattan-handy-price-guide</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Here's a breakdown of Manhattan and Brooklyn housing prices in the second quarter of 2008, according to reports from Miller Samuel and Douglas Elliman.
<p><strong>Average sales price</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Manhattan: $1,669,729</li>
<li>Brooklyn: $588,441</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Median sales price</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Manhattan: $1,025,000</li>
<li>Brooklyn: $525,000</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Average condo sales price</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Manhattan: $1,937,090</li>
<li>Brooklyn: $601,280</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Median condo sales price</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Manhattan: $1,267,000</li>
<li>Brooklyn: $514,725</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Average co-op sales price</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Manhattan: $1,280,201</li>
<li>Brooklyn: $332,250</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Median co-op sales price</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Manhattan: $755,000</li>
<li>Brooklyn: $255,000 </li>
</ul>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/brooklyn-vs-manhattan-handy-price-guide#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24352">Brooklyn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50017">Housing market</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24265">Manhattan</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:43:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Acitelli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71668 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Manhattan Housing Market as Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/manhattan-housing-market-six-degrees-kevin-bacon</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Next Tuesday is April 1, and the first-quarter housing market reports for Manhattan will start trickling out from brokerages like Halstead, Corcoran and Douglas Elliman. What will they say about home sales?
<p>No one knows for certain, of course, but the speculation should pick up noticably in the next few days so here goes:</p>
<p>The first quarter of any year is usually relatively paltry in terms of the number of closed deals because those deals were cut in the winter months, which are normally among the slowest in Manhattan housing.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/manhattan-housing-market-six-degrees-kevin-bacon">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/manhattan-housing-market-six-degrees-kevin-bacon#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50017">Housing market</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29812">Jonathan Miller</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24265">Manhattan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53669">miller samuel</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:39:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Acitelli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66889 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>STAT OF THE DAY: That Boxed-In Feeling </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/stat-day-boxed-feeling</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Manhattan's population grew 3.8 percent from July 1, 2001--two months before September 11--to July 1, 2007, according to new Census estimates. The borough's population now stands at an estimated 1,620,867. That's roughly 71,403 Manhattanites per square mile. </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/stat-day-boxed-feeling#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">O2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24265">Manhattan</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:39:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Acitelli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66751 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Brooklyn, Queens Among Nation&#039;s 10 Most Populous Counties </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/brooklyn-queens-among-nations-10-most-populous-counties</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Brooklyn is the seventh-largest county in the United States, <a href="http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/009756.html">according to new census estimates</a>. The County of Kings has 2,528,050 residents. Queens was No. 10 with 2,270,338; and Manhattan was No. 19 with 1,620,867 residents. The census' estimates run through July 1, 2007.
<p>Although all three experienced population gains over previous years' estimates going back to 2000, none were among the nation's 100 fastest-growing counties; nor were the Bronx or Staten Island. The Bronx was No. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/brooklyn-queens-among-nations-10-most-populous-counties">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/brooklyn-queens-among-nations-10-most-populous-counties#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52995">Green</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52722">Bronx</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24352">Brooklyn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24265">Manhattan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49998">Queens</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:47:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Acitelli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66740 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>STAT OF THE DAY: Two-Bedrooms Too Pricey Too</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/stat-day-two-bedrooms-too-pricey-too</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>I <a href="/2008/rents-remain-same">wrote in this week's paper</a> about how, even after all the calamitous economic news (like Bear Stearns' collapse), Manhattan rents appear buoyant if not strong. Most of the average rents I cited were for one-bedroom apartments. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/stat-day-two-bedrooms-too-pricey-too">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/stat-day-two-bedrooms-too-pricey-too#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52365">apartment market</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52385">bear stearns</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24265">Manhattan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51257">rents</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:59:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Acitelli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66710 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fed to Manhattan: Shine On, You Crazy Diamond! </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/feds-beige-book</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Brokers, developers, and the media have been trumpeting the resilience of Manhattan’s condo and co-op market for nearly a year, and now even the Federal Reserve has singled it out in the latest installment of its regional survey known as <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/fomc/beigebook/2008/20080305/2.htm">the “Beige Book.”</a> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/feds-beige-book">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/feds-beige-book#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50262">Co-op</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52568">condo</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53648">Economy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53647">Federal Reserve</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24265">Manhattan</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:56:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lysandra Ohrstrom</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66087 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
