Politics Daily

At Clinton's Morning-After Rally: Defiance

At Clinton's Morning-After Rally: Defiance
Getty Images

After suffering her ninth and tenth consecutive losses in a row last night, it’s understandable that Hillary Clinton this morning called for an alternate reality.

“Let’s get real,” she said in a Hunter College auditorium that seemed to be packed mostly with the middle-aged women who make up her base. “Let’s get real about this election. Let’s get real about our future.”

With the must-win contests in Texas and Ohio looming, Clinton’s task of exorcising Democratic voters of their enchantment with Barack Obama seems more difficult by the day. This morning, she continued to try to turn Obama’s eloquence against him by suggesting, once again, that he is all fancy talk and no action.

“It is time to get real, to get real about how we actually win this election,” she said, adding, “It is time that we moved from good words to good works, from good sound bites to good solutions.”

That line brought the crowd to its feet. It was less enthusiastically received when she went immediately back to the just-words well, repeating that the country needed a president “who relies not just on words but on work -- on hard work” and “we need to make a choice between speeches and solution” and “the best words in the world aren’t enough unless you match them with action.”

“This,” she added, “is becoming more apparent every day.”

But that message has yet to catch on with primary voters. He won by wide margins last night in Wisconsin and Hawaii and he has narrowed Clinton’s lead in Texas and Ohio. The media is circling.

The enthusiasm at today’s small-dollar fund-raiser was supposed to be an answer to that.

After a Broadway star belted the national anthem over crackling speaker feedback, shouts of “we love you Hillary” and building “Hillary” chants filled the music-less interval before Clinton and Chuck Schumer took the stage.

“It’s great to be home,” Clinton announced, to applause.

Then Schumer, who is balancing his roles as a critical Clinton supporter and Democratic Party leader, gave his Senate colleague an emphatic introduction that notably did not say anything negative about Obama.

Instead, he focused on John McCain.

“Make no mistake about it, this man follows Bush’s policies 95 percent of the time,” said Schumer, removing his glasses. “We have to beat him. To me it is a moral imperative.

“And we know who the candidate is who can beat him,” he said as the crowd rose to its feet and Clinton stood at his side with her hands folded in front of her.

Schumer echoed Clinton’s talking point that she was the only candidate who had withstood the assaults of the Republican attack machine and could do so again. He demonstrated this physically.

“When they take out their 2 by 4,” he said assuming a batter’s stance. “She’ll be ready with her 4 by 8 to hit them back.” He swung his imaginary lumber. Clinton seemed to approve.

He attested to Clinton’s knack for comebacks, and announced to Ohio and Texas: “Get ready, because here she comes.”

Clinton then took the podium. Rows of young enthusiastic people sat behind her, in the camera’s frame. In front of her the audience was mostly middle-aged. Many of the contributors were women with graying hair.

After quickly acknowledging the way things have actually gone for her (“I want to congratulate Senator Obama,” Clinton said, adding, “He has had a good couple of weeks”) she insisted the race was not supposed to be easy, was far from over and would come down to the primary states of Texas and Ohio, where, she said, “We are going to be squaring off.”

She did her best to attack what her campaign argues is a silly meta-narrative about Obama’s candidacy that has obscured the real issues.

“This campaign is not about a campaign,” she said. “This campaign is not about a personality, this campaign is about hundreds of millions of Americans.”

To reinforce the notion that she was the candidate most tethered to reality and the plight of working people, she added, “Now others might be joining a movement -- well I’m joining you on the night shift and the day shift.”

After the speech, some of Clinton’s supporters in the crowd picked up on that theme and expressed anger with the way things have unfolded.

“She’s changing her strategy because there are a lot of people who have fallen into the wake of Barack Obama and those people have to get real,” said Mary Ann Dellabadia, a 52-year-old nurse, who added that even if Obama made it through to the general election, “I’m not voting for him.”

“It is a cult and it’s mostly the college kids and they’re stupid,’ she said.

Her friend, Mary Jo Pane, interjected.

“I will vote ‘present’ if he is the Democratic candidate -- everyone I know feels that way,” said Pane, a 55-year-old nurse jewelry designer. “The press has made him what he is. It’s a very irresponsible election cycle when the press has this much control.”

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

renata (not verified) says:

Petulance. Denial. ANGER. George W.? Oops! Hillary.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

I don't think we need to get real. I think she does. This is over and no one's told her.

renatam (not verified) says:

Calling competitors (voters?) who don't agree with you a CULT or MOCKING them, is very Bush/Cheney/Republican. To his credit -- Barack REFUSES to go to that destructive/toxic place. Listening to the Machinist Union's Hillary supporter/surrogate calling Barack "silver-tongued" and "two-faced" man in love with the microphone -- is like a playground. Pathetic from those who are older and should know better, like Hillary. John McCain also loves pithy, toxic name-calling -- and he REALLY is too old for that. What are they hiding from by this kind of commentary and conduct? What are they trying to distract us from? When did these two candidates begin ambushing VOTERS as well as fellow candidates???

Turn the page!

Anonymous (not verified) says:

Why do I feel tha her Hillaryship's run for POTUS is falling apart? It could be because more of Barak Hussein Obama's supporters are making a point of saying & writing Barak Hussein Obama's full name to defang the crud who say that he is a crypto-Muslim. Her Hillaryship is acting more like a gambler who has blown all of her money on bad cards & bluff. She's now at the point of borrowing money on the vig so she can win back her money. Her criticsm of Barak Hussein Obama as plagerizing from Mass Gov Patrick is sad. It's about as bad as when the supporters of her health care plan during Slick Willy's time who were lobbying the hell of us senior citizens criticized the Harry & Louise commercials as being big money lobbying. That went over like a turd in a punch bowl. It's the same with accusing Barak Hussein Obama of plagerizing while she lift & uses the old words of others in her campaign. The thing of implicitly saying that her Hillaryship can plagarize but Barak Hussein Obama is playing dirty by using Gov Patrick's words. It doesn't fly Sen Clinton.
I have resisted calling Barak Hussein Obama's people of the assisted living facility where I live using the slogan, "Yes, we can." in their ads.
The guys using the crypto-Muslim rap to malign Barak Hussein Obama are clueless about the fact there are many devout Christians who are proud of their Muslim names & of being a Christian. The blowback on the crypto-Muslim trick could hit those who use it like tornados hit the Mid-West & South. Oh, it's going to be a dirty campaign, just like I like it.

JC (not verified) says:

This article quotes Clinton as saying, “Let’s get real...Let’s get real about this election. Let’s get real about our future....It is time to get real, to get real about how we actually win this election...It is time that we moved from good words to good works, from good sound bites to good solutions.”
~~~
Let's get real? I think the time to get real was 10 contests ago! Time to move from good words to good works? Good sound bites to good solutions? Pardon me, but what was the last "good word" that came out of Clinton's mouth? Her campaign in more negative than a Minnesota thermometer in January! Good solutions? Good works? Again I ask, shouldn't that have been 10 contests ago?

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.